Search found 2006 matches

by grizzler
24 Aug 2019 12:27
Forum: Software
Topic: owncloud client and keyring popup? [SOLVED]
Replies: 3
Views: 74

Re: owncloud client and keyring popup?

The owncloud client is not proprietary - it's here https://packages.debian.org/stretch-backports/owncloud-client. I don't think transip changed anything, but I'd always prefer to install it from debian. In this case I would have to disagree. As far as I'm aware TransIP did make some changes to the ...
by grizzler
16 Aug 2019 19:12
Forum: Testing Zone
Topic: Breakage and News Tracker for Debian Testing [Bullseye]
Replies: 10
Views: 963

Re: Breakage and News Tracker for Debian Testing [Bullseye]

Moved some recent posts from the ISO-maintenance thread here as they were off-topic there.
by grizzler
16 Aug 2019 18:50
Forum: Testing Zone
Topic: Community ISO maintenance and build issues - 2
Replies: 84
Views: 17556

Re: Community ISO maintenance and build issues - 2

The virtualbox packages are still missing from Debian's testing repo, but they don't seem to be in the solydxk-11/-ee repo either. Could you create a similar import setup as for solydxk-10, please? Thanks.
by grizzler
15 Aug 2019 17:48
Forum: Testing Zone
Topic: SolydXK 10 Testing [updated: 31-07-2019]
Replies: 108
Views: 7443

Re: SolydXK 10 Testing [updated: 31-07-2019]

Thanks.

Next issue: it looks like /usr/share/python-apt/templates/SolydXK.info (package solydxk-system) needs updating.

I didn't check the mirrors in /usr/share/python-apt/templates/SolydXK.mirrors. Are they still up-to-date?
by grizzler
14 Aug 2019 15:37
Forum: Testing Zone
Topic: SolydXK 10 Testing [updated: 31-07-2019]
Replies: 108
Views: 7443

Re: SolydXK 10 Preview and Testing

Arjen Balfoort wrote:
18 Jun 2019 06:25
For the time being, I've uploaded mugshot from sid to our repostory.
And this now blocks upgrading mugshot on the EEs...

Could you remove it from the solydxk-11/-ee section, please?
by grizzler
14 Aug 2019 12:00
Forum: Testing Zone
Topic: SolydXK 10 Testing [updated: 31-07-2019]
Replies: 108
Views: 7443

Re: SolydXK 10 Testing [updated: 31-07-2019]

Another cleanup item : fontconfig sabotages full removal of fonts. When you purge a package, dpkg won't remove non-empty directories. Unfortunately, during its trigger phase, fontconfig writes .uuid files into every single directory in /usr/share/fonts, which causes the directories of the fonts that...
by grizzler
13 Aug 2019 18:13
Forum: Testing Zone
Topic: SolydXK 10 Testing [updated: 31-07-2019]
Replies: 108
Views: 7443

Re: SolydXK 10 Testing [updated: 31-07-2019]

So, the manual/auto issue cannot be improved further. For the time being, I think good is good enough. Right? Yes, I think so. @Bas, phpmyadmin seems to be a bit of a mess right now: https://tracker.debian.org/pkg/phpmyadmin As it isn't even actively maintained in Debian, picking up a more up to da...
by grizzler
13 Aug 2019 12:31
Forum: Testing Zone
Topic: SolydXK 10 Testing [updated: 31-07-2019]
Replies: 108
Views: 7443

Re: SolydXK 10 Testing [updated: 31-07-2019]

Why does the SolydK 64-bit ISO have two microbit related packages ( firmware-microbit-micropython and firmware-microbit-micropython-doc)? Considering what BBC micro:bit actually is, I don't think they would be a lot of use on a KDE-system... If you decide to remove them, you may want to remove fonts...
by grizzler
12 Aug 2019 06:11
Forum: Testing Zone
Topic: SolydX packages
Replies: 22
Views: 1678

Re: SolydX packages

I'm not entirely sure about this lot and I don't have the time to do a thorough check right now. As I mentioned earlier, when you remove transitional packages, you have to be careful. They usually have one or more dependencies which are the packages that replaced them. If those are marked as automat...
by grizzler
05 Aug 2019 17:26
Forum: Testing Zone
Topic: SolydXK 10 Testing [updated: 31-07-2019]
Replies: 108
Views: 7443

Re: SolydXK 10 Testing [updated: 31-07-2019]

Just realised I forgot to double the #s in lines 28-30, so here's another tarball.
by grizzler
04 Aug 2019 13:30
Forum: Testing Zone
Topic: SolydXK 10 Testing [updated: 31-07-2019]
Replies: 108
Views: 7443

Re: SolydXK 10 Testing [updated: 31-07-2019]

The attached tarball contains the imt-cmp script, which can be used to compare installed packages in two build structures. You can run it from anywhere, but the easiest is to put it in the directory that contains the directories with the build structures and then open a terminal on that directory. R...
by grizzler
04 Aug 2019 10:08
Forum: Testing Zone
Topic: SolydXK 10 Testing [updated: 31-07-2019]
Replies: 108
Views: 7443

Re: SolydXK 10 Testing [updated: 31-07-2019]

I re-read your post several times and tried to figure out whether you think there was too much removed in the 64bit images or not enough? To be honest, I didn't even look at it that way. I upgraded my 32-bit build structures, just to see if that worked, and then ran a compare. That showed an unusua...
by grizzler
03 Aug 2019 16:55
Forum: Testing Zone
Topic: SolydXK 10 Testing [updated: 31-07-2019]
Replies: 108
Views: 7443

Re: SolydXK 10 Testing [updated: 31-07-2019]

...juggle my spare time between live and SolydXK... Tell me about it. Apart from SolydXK vs real life, there's this other project I've had on hold since May, when another project suddenly got precedence. And that little thing about the AVG-setup I promised someone who couldn't get his head around i...
by grizzler
03 Aug 2019 08:32
Forum: Testing Zone
Topic: SolydXK 10 Testing [updated: 31-07-2019]
Replies: 108
Views: 7443

Re: SolydXK 10 Testing [updated: 31-07-2019]

Your scripts do not consider the differences between what's installed in the 64-bit ISOs vs the 32-bit ISOs. Now you may be sceptical about the relevance of that comparison, but I assure you it is. If you compare the last SolydXK 9 sets, there is very little real difference between them, mainly vers...
by grizzler
03 Aug 2019 05:34
Forum: Testing Zone
Topic: SolydXK 10 Testing [updated: 31-07-2019]
Replies: 108
Views: 7443

Re: SolydXK 10 Testing [updated: 31-07-2019]

@Arjen,

I'll take a look at your scripts later today. Depeding on that, I may or may not (need to) create the extract of my build scripts I mentioned earlier.
by grizzler
03 Aug 2019 05:30
Forum: Bug Control
Topic: Gnome-keyring problems (with chromium) [partly solved]
Replies: 23
Views: 1237

Re: Gnome-keyring problems (with chromium) [partly solved]

Agreed. The 'default' file isn't in the way.
by grizzler
02 Aug 2019 06:26
Forum: Testing Zone
Topic: SolydXK 10 Testing [updated: 31-07-2019]
Replies: 108
Views: 7443

Re: SolydXK 10 Testing [updated: 31-07-2019]

If you tell me how you got to this list I can create my own to cleanup the ISOs even further. Basically, you need the build structure with the 64-bit ISO and another build structure, unpacked from the last 32-bit ISO that was produced, upgraded to SolydXK 10. Then you create a list of installed pac...
by grizzler
01 Aug 2019 13:03
Forum: Testing Zone
Topic: SolydXK 10 Testing [updated: 31-07-2019]
Replies: 108
Views: 7443

Re: SolydXK 10 Testing [updated: 31-07-2019]

Arjen, Is it possible a number of automatically installed packages got marked as manually installed on the SolydXK 10 ISOs? I upgraded (a copy of) the 32-bit build structures and ran a compare 32 vs 64 bit. After weeding out the differences I ended up with this (SolydK only - checking SolydX is next...
by grizzler
31 Jul 2019 17:48
Forum: Bug Control
Topic: Gnome-keyring problems (with chromium) [partly solved]
Replies: 23
Views: 1237

Re: Gnome-keyring problems (with chromium) [partly solved]

Arjen Balfoort wrote:
31 Jul 2019 16:12
I think this is designed behavior and not intended to be pre-generated.

Shall I remove the unprotected keyring from solydx-system-adjustments-10?
Well, I would. Ilu?
by grizzler
30 Jul 2019 21:08
Forum: Bug Control
Topic: Gnome-keyring problems (with chromium) [partly solved]
Replies: 23
Views: 1237

Re: Gnome-keyring problems (with chromium) [partly solved]

This lot is confusing. ilu wrote: We need to setup the system like it was in SolydX9. But initially that was no different in SolydX 10, was it? There are no /etc/skel/.local/share/keyrings directories in any of the local build structures I have here (which includes unpacked 'stable' ISOs). Not in 9,...

Go to advanced search