systemd on Solydxk

Here is the place were the team and the community projects meet together. Help us to develop SolydXK projects or contribute your ideas for future releases.
User avatar
TheMadMechanic
Posts: 5
Joined: 23 Dec 2013 14:46

systemd on Solydxk

Postby TheMadMechanic » 31 Dec 2013 18:06

First off: https://wiki.debian.org/systemd

I know this is Debian based and Debian doesn't use systemd by default

I'd love to see SolydXK go systemd by default. It would take some work but I'd even be willing to financially kick into a pot to make it happen.

Thoughts?

User avatar
Orbmiser
Posts: 829
Joined: 24 Aug 2013 22:58
Location: Portland,Oregon

Re: systemd on Solydxk

Postby Orbmiser » 31 Dec 2013 19:14

Well the Ashes haven't cleared yet.

http://lwn.net/Articles/578208/

http://www.reddit.com/r/linux/comments/ ... ians_init/

And guess I started a firestorm when I asked what's so important about portability and reasons for supporting Hurd/BSD which make up 0.09% of the Linux masses. And one of the reasons given for not going systemd is portability for them.
http://www.reddit.com/r/linux/comments/ ... s_of_code/

And still have to wait for Debian to make a decision on the issue.
And don't think the Solyd Team really has the time or numbers to tackle something along these lines?

I'm sure they will chime in with their reasonings.

My needs tho as just a desktop user I imagine doesn't see a need in the short term and question whether changing will actually give me any tangible benefits?
.
Portfolio
http://500px.com/Orbmiser
Flickr
http://www.flickr.com/photos/orb9220/

SolydK - Kernel 3.16-2-amd64 - KDE 4.14.1 Update Pack: 2014.10.15

User avatar
ScottQuier
Posts: 1781
Joined: 18 Jul 2013 15:55
Location: Newport News, VA

Re: systemd on Solydxk

Postby ScottQuier » 31 Dec 2013 19:57

I had a bit of a play with this (--> http://forums.solydxk.nl/viewtopic.php?f=5&t=2114) and, for me, there was/is no reason to migrate to systemd. I can see where, eventually, there will be some huge benefits, but it's not there yet.

And, like Orbmiser has said, the SolydXK team doesn't yet have the manpower to tackle something this large; gotta remember, the SoldyXK dev team is only 4 people.
Scott
Quoting zerozero, "The usage of PPA's in debian-based
systems is risky at best and entails serious compatibility
problems; usually it's the best way to destroy an install"

User avatar
Orbmiser
Posts: 829
Joined: 24 Aug 2013 22:58
Location: Portland,Oregon

Re: systemd on Solydxk

Postby Orbmiser » 31 Dec 2013 20:00

Yep I definitely think systemd is a step in the right direction for the future.
And down the road we will begin to gleam the benefits when apps are written to take advantage of it.

But presently it will not give you faster boot times or magically make your system run better.
In fact still needs a lot more work and if anything it's throwing possible issues and bugs into the desktop.
.
Portfolio
http://500px.com/Orbmiser
Flickr
http://www.flickr.com/photos/orb9220/

SolydK - Kernel 3.16-2-amd64 - KDE 4.14.1 Update Pack: 2014.10.15

User avatar
fleabus
Posts: 1227
Joined: 16 Sep 2013 04:24
Location: Winchester, VA USA

Re: systemd on Solydxk

Postby fleabus » 31 Dec 2013 20:09

Orbmiser wrote:And guess I started a firestorm when I asked what's so important about portability and reasons for supporting Hurd/BSD which make up 0.09% of the Linux masses. And one of the reasons given for not going systemd is portability for them.
You go Orb! Very interesting reading over there!
Orbmiser wrote:And still have to wait for Debian to make a decision on the issue.
Definitely. The way I see it we shouldn't even try to get involved in this. Never mind the lack of manpower, it simply wouldn't make any difference until Mom & Dad decide what they're gonna do with this whole init thing. And then just go with the flow. IMHO we're a Debian distro, so we use Debian's init system (whatever it turns out to be) in order to remain 100% Debian compatible. The beauty of it is that anyone is free to do with it as they wish. I followed Scott's systemd posts with great interest. And got busy. Or sidetracked from my sidetrack. Or something... :lol:

User avatar
Orbmiser
Posts: 829
Joined: 24 Aug 2013 22:58
Location: Portland,Oregon

Re: systemd on Solydxk

Postby Orbmiser » 31 Dec 2013 20:30

Yep don't mind the negative attacks as that's how I learn from others that are more knowledgeable.
Pointing out flaws in my opinions and biases.

But still confused why portability is so damn important to Debian when we are talking the 0.09% of Linux Hurd/BSD crowd. I'm all for portability until it starts to hinder or hold back. Or in Debian way used as a poor argument against systemd.

But hey no biggie. Might not even be here on the planet when the benefits are realized and utilized later.
.
Portfolio
http://500px.com/Orbmiser
Flickr
http://www.flickr.com/photos/orb9220/

SolydK - Kernel 3.16-2-amd64 - KDE 4.14.1 Update Pack: 2014.10.15

User avatar
fleabus
Posts: 1227
Joined: 16 Sep 2013 04:24
Location: Winchester, VA USA

Re: systemd on Solydxk

Postby fleabus » 31 Dec 2013 20:38

Orbmiser wrote:Or in Debian way used as a poor argument against systemd.
FWIW, I quite agree. But all that is so far above my paygrade I'm chokin' for lack of oxygen up here. I shall leave it to those greater than myself... :lol:

Deleted User 2763

Re: systemd on Solydxk

Postby Deleted User 2763 » 31 Dec 2013 23:14

BTW... siduction just released with systemd.
-Hinto

User avatar
fleabus
Posts: 1227
Joined: 16 Sep 2013 04:24
Location: Winchester, VA USA

Re: systemd on Solydxk

Postby fleabus » 31 Dec 2013 23:30

Yes, Interesting! I was just looking at that....

bodam
Posts: 28
Joined: 10 Oct 2013 02:22

Re: systemd on Solydxk

Postby bodam » 05 Jan 2014 05:27

I installed systemd on my SolydX system months ago without any issues. Day to day, there is no noticable difference but becuase this is my laptop, and the HD is an SSD, 20 second boot up and 10 second shutdown is nice. I don't have any issues so far. I just have to be careful that the upgrades do not try to put back the old init system
David Inglehart

User avatar
Omega
Posts: 48
Joined: 25 Aug 2013 16:33
Location: Las Vegas, NV

Re: systemd on Solydxk

Postby Omega » 17 Jan 2014 15:53

Systemd is a dependency for Gnome 3, so Debian is stuck between portability and compatibility.

I personally think Linux is already the open source standard, so I'm more inclined to support Systemd.

SolydK Home Edition 64Bit
Samsung Galaxy Note 3
Steam User

User avatar
Orbmiser
Posts: 829
Joined: 24 Aug 2013 22:58
Location: Portland,Oregon

Re: systemd on Solydxk

Postby Orbmiser » 17 Jan 2014 22:52

Spotify throws their weight behind systemd in Debian
http://www.reddit.com/r/LinuxActionShow ... ystemd_in/

Debian May Be Leaning Towards Systemd Over Upstart
http://www.phoronix.com/scan.php?page=n ... px=MTU3NDc
Keith Packard of Intel and Debian's newest tech-cttee member, voiced his opinions on the matter this week. Keith ended up being in support of systemd and his opinion basically came down to, "I believe that Debian will need to support multiple init systems going forward, even on Linux. However, on Linux, I believe that the vast majority of Debian users would be best served by encouraging them to use systemd by making that the default."

So seems more slowly leaning towards systemd.
.
Portfolio
http://500px.com/Orbmiser
Flickr
http://www.flickr.com/photos/orb9220/

SolydK - Kernel 3.16-2-amd64 - KDE 4.14.1 Update Pack: 2014.10.15

Notsonoble
Posts: 14
Joined: 11 Jul 2013 16:07

Re: systemd on Solydxk

Postby Notsonoble » 11 Feb 2014 19:39

https://lists.debian.org/debian-ctte/20 ... 00405.html

Looks like Jessie will be systemd by default. So it maybe time for the solyd team to be looking at it.

User avatar
wyrdoak
Posts: 113
Joined: 07 Jan 2014 21:25

Re: systemd on Solydxk

Postby wyrdoak » 11 Feb 2014 20:43

I just gave it a go. I'm using the slower third of my HDD for SolydK because Win7 needs all the help it can get. ;)

Code: Select all

wyrdoak@acer-netbook ~ $ systemd-analyze
Startup finished in 12.758s (kernel) + 48.506s (userspace) = 1min 1.264s
More importantly it looks like it fixed the problem of FireFox killing my graphics and having to do a hard reboot. It loves to stick and suck up resources from time to time.
EDIT----
I did have some technical problems with my bluetooth dongle after the change.

To start the bluetooth systemd service use the command:

# systemctl start bluetooth

To enable the bluetooth service at boot time use the command:

# systemctl enable bluetooth

https://wiki.archlinux.org/index.php/Bl ... USB_Dongle

Now if I could only get it to work in SolydX.

Acer Aspire One AO532h; CPU Atom n450 1.66Gh: 2GB RAM, duel boot with Win7: SolydK32

User avatar
sumitb
Posts: 43
Joined: 17 Jan 2014 03:44
Location: Jakarta - Indonesia

Re: systemd on Solydxk

Postby sumitb » 12 Feb 2014 03:57

I also am in favor of using systemd instead of sysv or upstart because of the great boot time performance. I am an intermediately skilled Linux user, using it since 1999 and learning everyday. By far, SUSE and Fedora/Korora have given me the best boot times and debian the worst. Ubuntu based distros came second.

Although its a common notion that Linux users do not reboot their systems much and Bootup speeds don't matter, its not true for me at least. I have a laptop and in my day to day work, i have to move from one place to another twice a day for which I either shutdown or hibernate my system. Solydk is my primary OS and even after some tuning and leaving only services that I use enabled at boot up, I am not able to get anything better than 1 min 40 secs until KDE Desktop becomes functional which is not that high but can be better. On Fedora and OpenSUSE, its around 58 secs to Desktop on the same system. It just feels more responsive and fast with these two.

I am not putting down SolydK or anything, its a fabulous distro and is my primary one. Not using Systemd is just one "shortcoming", if i must say, it has. Otherwise, all the pluses are in its favor.

Oh, there is one more thing that i miss in Debian, deltarpms or deltadebs whatever. I know Debian has its own reasons for not supporting it, but for someone living with limited internet connections, its really a blessing. Last night, my fedora system updated, there was 1 GB of data to download, and deltarpms reduced it to 200 MB!! :)

Anyways, I still like Debian and its philosophies a lot.
Machine: Lenovo G580, Corei5-3210M, 8GB DDR3 1600Mhz RAM, Intel HD4000, Seagate 500GB HDD, Intel HD-ALC269VC Audio, Broadcom BCM4313 WLAN, Atheros AR8162 LAN, Broadcom BCM20702A0 BT

OS: SolydK x64, SolydX x64 in VB
Alt OS: Windows 8.1 x64


User avatar
sumitb
Posts: 43
Joined: 17 Jan 2014 03:44
Location: Jakarta - Indonesia

Re: systemd on Solydxk

Postby sumitb » 13 Feb 2014 03:08

BTW, I stumbled across this mailing list post today, which seems we will see some interesting developments related to systemd by end of this year. Well, this is exciting! 8-)

https://lists.debian.org/debian-devel-a ... 00004.html

Maybe SolydXK will be able to switch to systemd easily once it is thoroughly tested by debian team :)
Machine: Lenovo G580, Corei5-3210M, 8GB DDR3 1600Mhz RAM, Intel HD4000, Seagate 500GB HDD, Intel HD-ALC269VC Audio, Broadcom BCM4313 WLAN, Atheros AR8162 LAN, Broadcom BCM20702A0 BT

OS: SolydK x64, SolydX x64 in VB
Alt OS: Windows 8.1 x64


kurotsugi
Posts: 2185
Joined: 09 Jan 2014 00:17

Re: systemd on Solydxk

Postby kurotsugi » 13 Feb 2014 06:33

kurotsugi@kurozv3:~$ systemd-analyze time
Startup finished in 3.013s (kernel) + 10.569s (userspace) = 13.582s
kurotsugi@kurozv3:~$
I can understand that systemd isn't optimized on debian yet but one minute is rather too long. I got my system boot up less than 15 second.

jeffreyC
Posts: 22
Joined: 28 Dec 2013 18:15

Re: systemd on Solydxk

Postby jeffreyC » 14 Feb 2014 01:07

sumitb wrote:Oh, there is one more thing that i miss in Debian, deltarpms or deltadebs whatever. I know Debian has its own reasons for not supporting it, but for someone living with limited internet connections, its really a blessing. Last night, my fedora system updated, there was 1 GB of data to download, and deltarpms reduced it to 200 MB!! :)
Though off-topic you should look at debdelta

http://debdelta.debian.net/

https://packages.debian.org/search?keywords=debdelta

there is a package for what you want, it simply is not the default.

http://flossexperiences.wordpress.com/2 ... deb-delta/

User avatar
Arjen Balfoort
Site Admin
Posts: 9130
Joined: 26 Jan 2013 19:36
Location: Netherlands
Contact:

Re: systemd on Solydxk

Postby Arjen Balfoort » 25 Feb 2014 09:56

So, I've been playing around with it.
I ran as root:

Code: Select all

apt-get install systemd systemd-sysv
apt-get purge hal*
systemctl enable bluetooth
/usr/bin/yes YES | /usr/sbin/sensors-detect
and rebooted.
I can't say booting is quicker, but it's not slower either.

I am worried about this message during boot:
Failed to start /etc/rc.local Compatibility.
This is what I get when I run "systemctl status rc-local.service", but that doesn't help me much:

Code: Select all

rc-local.service - /etc/rc.local Compatibility
   Loaded: loaded (/lib/systemd/system/rc-local.service; static)
   Active: failed (Result: exit-code) since Mon 2014-02-24 23:33:22 HAST; 18min ago
  Process: 802 ExecStart=/etc/rc.local start (code=exited, status=32)
I've been searching the net, but haven't come close to an explanation, nor a solution.
Does anybody know about this?


SolydXK needs you!
Development | Testing | Translations

User avatar
wyrdoak
Posts: 113
Joined: 07 Jan 2014 21:25

Re: systemd on Solydxk

Postby wyrdoak » 25 Feb 2014 16:35

I still new, so not really sure what it does yet. But here's mine.

Code: Select all

acer-netbook wyrdoak # systemctl status rc-local.service
rc-local.service - /etc/rc.local Compatibility
   Loaded: loaded (/lib/systemd/system/rc-local.service; static)
   Active: failed (Result: exit-code) since Tue 2014-02-25 06:10:03 EST; 5h 21min ago

Feb 25 06:10:03 acer-netbook systemd[1]: rc-local.service: control process exited, code=exit...=32
Feb 25 06:10:03 acer-netbook systemd[1]: Failed to start /etc/rc.local Compatibility.
Feb 25 06:10:03 acer-netbook systemd[1]: Unit rc-local.service entered failed state.
acer-netbook wyrdoak # systemctl enable rc-local.service
The unit files have no [Install] section. They are not meant to be enabled
using systemctl.
Possible reasons for having this kind of units are:
1) A unit may be statically enabled by being symlinked from another unit's
   .wants/ or .requires/ directory.
2) A unit's purpose may be to act as a helper for some other unit which has
   a requirement dependency on it.
3) A unit may be started when needed via activation (socket, path, timer,
   D-Bus, udev, scripted systemctl call, ...).

Acer Aspire One AO532h; CPU Atom n450 1.66Gh: 2GB RAM, duel boot with Win7: SolydK32


Return to “Suggestions & ideas / Open Projects”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 3 guests