ISO testing 201410

[Arjen Balfoort]

It's either that or install mintInstall.
Currently there are no differences. So, there is no reason to maintain a SolydXK specific version.
I am slowly changing all our software to a more generic solution. This way other distributions can more easily adapt that to their needs. I have done this also for mintInstall. I only want to leave configuration packages for SolydXK because they are very specific. I also hope to attract developers this way because doing this alone is not the ideal situation (for SolydXK and me personally).

softwaremanager and solydxk-softwaremanager have identical code, only the branding has changed and the installation directories. You would have had the some problem if solydxk-softwaremanager was installed and it probably would have been resolved if you reinstalled softwaremanager instead of solydxk-softwaremanager.

In this case it's just a bug: softwaremanager is a python2.7 application, not python3. I will look at that when the time comes.

[zerozero]

update-jessie.txt

(503.91 KiB) Downloaded 310 times

see for yourself.

[Arjen Balfoort]

New ISOS were uploaded to dev:

• live-installer updated with several translations.
• softwaremanager was replaced by the old solydxk-softwaremanager.

If everybody agrees, these are the version ready for production.

[zerozero]

it looks fine to me.

[balloon]

I confirmed installer of new iso at once.
I want to revise some sentences, but may I carry it out?
But this is not a big problem. It may be released as the present.

[Arjen Balfoort]

I confirmed installer of new iso at once.
I want to revise some sentences, but may I carry it out?
But this is not a big problem. It may be released as the present.

You can upload the the changes to GitHub. They will, however, not be included in these ISOs (it takes a lot of time to build and upload them).

[balloon]

You can upload the the changes to GitHub. They will, however, not be included in these ISOs (it takes a lot of time to build and upload them).

OK, I take time for the next release slowly and carefully and make modifications.

There is no point to be worried about remarkably elsewhere.

[MAYBL8]

Was this fixed in the isos:
http://forums.solydxk.com/viewtopic.php ... nky#p46791

[fleabus]

SolydK64-201411, perfect install! Smooth sailing, Thank you Schoelje, really like the new installer!

So incredibly boring!

I know it's been tough, to understate the issue you've been busting butt for a long time trying to smooth things out.

Ya done good.

[Arjen Balfoort]

Was this fixed in the isos:
http://forums.solydxk.com/viewtopic.php ... nky#p46791

I haven't had time to look at conky.

[Snap]

Downloading.

[Snap]

Total smoothness in English (SolydK32). Gonna try a second install in Spanish. 64 bit will follow.

[Snap]

The same for the second install.

BTW. I'm happy with the installer translation, but not too much with the system translation. It's not very es_ES. It's more es_somewhere-in-south-america. But I guess this doesn't depend on SolydXK and more in KDE and LibreOffice, isn't it?

[Snap]

SolydK64 smooth as a baby's butt. Great job, Schoelje.

[Arjen Balfoort]

The same for the second install.

BTW. I'm happy with the installer translation, but not too much with the system translation. It's not very es_ES. It's more es_somewhere-in-south-america. But I guess this doesn't depend on SolydXK and more in KDE and LibreOffice, isn't it?

I have no influence over any translation packages except for our own software.

[just]

the live-installer in the 201411 development ISOs continues to install without a problem 2+ SolydXK-64bit occurences in different partitions on the same computer. a mission impossible for me with 201407 installer.

plymouth-on-nvidia works flawlessly as well, in both live session and installed system.

good.

[Arjen Balfoort]

The ISOs are now in production: http://forums.solydxk.nl/viewtopic.php?f=2&t=5053

Locking this topic.